Gender Bias in Custodial Decisions – A Critical Analysis

Legal Jurisprudence

This paper critically examines the gender bias inherent in India’s custodial jurisprudence, particularly in divorce-related custody decisions. Despite the ostensibly gender-neutral language of statutes like the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, and the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, judicial application often favors mothers by default, under the influence of the patriarchal "Tender Years" doctrine. Fathers, even when equally or better equipped emotionally and financially, are frequently relegated to secondary roles or limited visitation rights, undermining their parental involvement and the child's welfare. This research analyses key case laws, judicial trends, and constitutional principles under Articles 14, 15, and 21 to highlight systemic biases. It also explores comparative legal frameworks in jurisdictions such as the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada, which have increasingly adopted shared parenting models to ensure balanced custody arrangements. Through doctrinal legal research and critical analysis, the study underscores the need for legislative and judicial reform in India to reflect contemporary societal roles and uphold the best interests of the child. The findings advocate for codified joint custody norms, gender-neutral legal language, and stronger enforcement mechanisms for visitation aiming toward a more equitable and child-centric custodial system.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.