Effectiveness of International Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in Bangladesh

Dispute Law, International Law

Purpose: This study investigated the effectiveness of international dispute settlement mechanisms in Bangladesh. It focused on how legal awareness, accessibility to ADR institutions and government engagement influence outcomes. The study’s aim was to identify the strengths and weaknesses in Bangladesh’s approach to international dispute resolution. Methodology: The research used a quantitative method based on survey responses from 100 participants. Respondents came from legal, governmental, academic, business and civil society sectors. The data were collected using a five-point Likert scale and analyzed through SPSS regression models. Results: The analysis found strong positive relationships between the dependent variable and all three independent variables. Government engagement, accessibility and trust in ADR institutions and legal awareness significantly influence the effectiveness of dispute settlement mechanisms. The model explained 68.4% of the variance in effectiveness. Findings: Government involvement is essential for ensuring credibility and compliance with international obligations. Accessibility to ADR institutions makes dispute settlement faster and more inclusive. Legal awareness helps stakeholders engage effectively with legal procedures. The study also confirms that public trust and state commitment are vital for improving the outcomes of dispute resolution. Conclusion: The study shows that international dispute mechanisms can be more effective in Bangladesh when supported by informed citizens, trusted institutions and proactive government actions. The findings match with previous studies and highlight the need for education, reform and coordination. A strong legal culture combined with institutional support can strengthen Bangladesh’s ability to resolve disputes fairly and efficiently.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.