INTERROGATIVE COERCION: UNRAVELING THE LEGITIMACY OF CONFESSION OBTAINED UNDER DURESS IN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS”

Law

The issue of interrogative coercion and its impact on the legitimacy of confessions obtained under duress in criminal investigations is a topic of immense significance within the realm of criminal law. This research paper delves into the complex legal landscape surrounding interrogative coercion, aiming to analyze the ethical, moral, and legal dimensions of confessions procured under circumstances of duress during interrogations. The research begins by exploring the historical evolution of interrogation techniques, tracing the development from traditional methods to contemporary practices. It critically evaluates the ethical boundaries crossed when coercion is employed to extract confessions, raising pertinent questions about the reliability and admissibility of such evidence in judicial proceedings. The paper also examines the psychological effects of coercive tactics on individuals subjected to intense interrogation pressures, shedding light on the potential for false confessions and miscarriages of justice. Furthermore, this research scrutinizes the existing legal frameworks governing interrogative coercion across various jurisdictions, highlighting notable case laws and legislative provisions. It conducts a comparative analysis to identify divergences and convergences in legal standards, emphasizing the evolving judicial attitudes towards coerced confessions and their implications for the administration of justice. Moreover, the paper explores the role of safeguards and procedural protections aimed at mitigating the risks associated with interrogative coercion. It discusses the significance of Miranda rights, access to legal counsel, video recording of interrogations, and other measures designed to uphold the fairness and integrity of the investigative process.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.