Evaluating the benefits and limitations of Robotic assistant surgery in orthopedics

Medical

The main advantages of robot-assisted orthopedic surgery over conventional orthopedic techniques are improved accuracy and precision in the preparation of bone surfaces, more reliable and reproducible outcomes, and greater spatial accuracy. Robotic systems are well suited for use in orthopedic surgery. Robotic devices can be firmly attached to bones by isolating and strongly fixing them in certain locations. The computer control of the robotic system is made simpler by treating the bone as a fixed object. Commercially available robotic systems fall into one of two categories: positioning, milling/cutting, or passive/active devices. Although computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery is a similar field of orthopaedic technological advancement, robot-assisted orthopaedic surgery can attain levels of safety, accuracy, and precision that computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery cannot. Robot-assisted orthopedic surgery is now being researched for use in trauma and spinal surgeries, total hip and knee replacement, and tunnel implantation for knee ligament reconstruction. There are no published long-term statistics defining the effectiveness of robot-assisted orthopedic surgery, despite a number of short-term research showing the viability of robotic applications in orthopedics. Before robot-assisted orthopaedic surgery is generally accessible, concerns about cost, training, and safety need to be resolved. Although it is still extremely early in its development, robot-assisted orthopaedic surgery has the potential to revolutionize orthopaedic operations in the future.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.