MATHEMATICAL MODELING AND DYNAMIC DEVELOPMENT DESIGN OF AFAM POWER GAS TURBINE PLANT BY TRANSFORMATIVE DATA: CLUE ON AMBIENT FACTOR, ENERGY, AND FISCAL MATTERS

Petroleum and Gas Engineering

This article evaluates the multi-objective performance of meffio technology using NSGA-II data to measure its energy, economic, and environmental performance. Two objective functions are shown. Cost of the environmental effect is placed second after overall cost rate. Both with and without the air preheater, objective function optimization has already been carried out. The air preheater decreased both desired functions. In the best case scenario, cycle without air preheater costs 30% more overall and costs the environment 33% more than cycle with air preheater. A sensitivity analysis of fuel unit cost was also performed. The total cost rate was higher and Pareto solutions were more sensitive to fuel unit cost at the lowest attainable environmental cost rate. The combustor loses the greatest energy (around 73%) when tested for energy losses across a number of components. The ambient temperature has an impact on the exergy losses and efficiency of various elements. All parts' exergy efficiency decreased as ambient temperature increased, and exergy losses increased. Energy efficiency drops as ambient temperature rises, going from 51% to 49% for a rise from 293 to 323 Kelvin.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.